Hi all,
sorry for this long rant - if your Sunday is packed full of activity,
you may skip this mail peacefully.
An acquaintance of mine asked me to recover an old Laptop that no OS on
it. I did using the latest ubuntu. I made her aware of all "caveats":
"this laptop won't run Windows programs". She was fine with it. The
laptop is for her child, which attends local German elementary school.
After a while she contacted me again, worried: her child needs
"Blitzrechnen" from the German publisher Klett, since at school they
would train mental arithmetic. I've been confronted with this when my
youngest was at elementary school, a similar Windows software I don't
recall, and was able to make it run using Wine. My acquaintance got a no
cost copied CD-R from school with the password written on it.
I wasn't able to get "Blitzrechnen" running - I tried several Wine
versions each 32 and 64 bit - the app is not complex, seems like a
series of flash animated pages where the user is asked to solve math
problems, nicely drawn with animals and stuff.
The publisher himself has updated his learning material: it is now
available via Android/iOS app - but I presume she has to pay for it.
This situation really makes me upset, since she is forced to make use of
a Windows 7, 8, 8.1, or 10 (or macOS) to make it run *if exactly this
software is needed*. There should be no barriers to get children
equipped with learning material, and if it gets digital, those barriers
should be compliant to learning standards, *not to market ones*.
There is no orchestrated guideline in our local education it seems. Each
school proceeds by its own "ideas" and "means". Back in the days, in
Germay, I was aware of the "Kultusminister Konferenz" - one of its
mission is to set those standards, i.e. "to work towards securing
quality standards in schools, vocational training and higher education"
(https://www.kmk.org/kmk/aufgaben.html), whereas here, locally, there is
none such effort.
Digital Sustainability should be introduced when it comes to digital
learning material - at least it should elaborate principles, where
access to learning material has low hurdles (like, for e.g., available
both on and offline through a browser, from as many OSes as possible).
Those standards should then be respected by local schools and higher
education institutes.
And I am deliberately not touching on the subject of cost efficiency in
this matter: In a public administration context that does not take into
account final cost statements, it makes little sense.
And, yes, I will made her aware of free alternative math training apps,
but the child will not be able to use the same app. At the end, we're
talking about math here. Does learning math need one special software?
If yes, then we're doomed.
Cheers,
#pasquale