This topic is for testing over https://talk.lugbz.org
This msg is directed to ex lugbz-mailinglist subscrbers via service https://talk.lugbz.org :
Topic = TESTING
Category = General
If you want help this testing, please just confirm getting the message.
Thanks,
diego
2 Likes
Yes I received this message. And I expect NOT to receive a copy of my message (this one).
Everyone else on lugbz talk is receiving your messages and my answer.
ciao
gabriella
Thanks Gabriella.
May you please confirm that you also received this replica, done from gmail on PC?
diego
I am on gmail on PC as well
ciao
Hi! Only one person is reading this thread?
diego
Hallo Diego,
das ist ein öffentlicher Post. Jeder kann ihn lesen.
Ich verstehe die Frage nicht.
LG
Andreas
Hoi Andreas, magari leggi dall’inizio?
Sto cercando di capire chi riceve questi msg. nella mail oltre che in Discours.
diego
A quanto capisco chi legge questi messaggi nella mail è chi ha scelto di riceverli via email, uno alla volta oppure come digest.
1 Like
Hola listeners,
this topic has been moved from category “general” to category “Site Feedback”
because it started for testing how talk.lugbz.org works.
I believe the starting point was kind of mistake:
@diego.maniacco wrote:
“This msg is directed to ex lugbz-mailinglist subscrbers via service https://talk.lugbz.org :
Topic = TESTING
Category = General
If you want help this testing, please just confirm getting the message.”
A.f.a.i.k. it is not possible “reach” all ex lugbz-list-mailinglist subscribers this way.
Trying to be more precise:
All people who came to https://talk.lugbz.org were able to read the message in category “General”, and could have answered the post once registered (everyone registered can write in category “General”)
All registered people with the option “mailinglist mode” active (or specific equivalent options without “mailinglist mode” have received the post also in their registered mailbox.
A.f.a.i.k. this is basically the present way the system works. In future it might change.
Therefore:
Considering that probably the goal of the test is/was not clear, probably the best place to clear it up is this place “Site Feedback”
The present description of “Site Feedback” says:
Sorry Anton: the test was done on category “General” to test that specific category.
Move the test to another category without asking the first autor (me) looks quite an authority act. May you please reconsider your action?
Tnks, diego
We have now the big task to create a clear category-tree to make it easier for users to post in the right category.
the general category will have to be used (as defined by the developer-team of discourse") as “residual category” only if no better place exists.
Your question is very much related to “Discussion about this site, its organization, how it works, and how we can improve it.” (description of category “Site Feedback”)
Please be patient and continue helping to improve talk.lugbz.org for communitybuilding - one place to keep in mind https://talk.lugbz.org/faq
You will build a prigion? …
diego, never dreamed to build a prison.
possiamo anche colloquiare in italiano, diego, forse ci capiamo meglio - scherzo.
allora diego, seriamente: mi pare che ti manchi una mailinglist pubblica. ho preparato una pensando a te.
si chiama free-lugbz-list@freelists.org mi pare…
penso che riuscirei anche a passare la lista a te come owner… (dovrei un po’ ristudiare i vecchi tempi quando utilizzavo freelist per ecolnet e la campagna “banning poverty”…
con questo link intanto puoi iscriverti (se non erro):
https://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/search?search=free-lugbz-list
toni
TestReply via mail…
And it’s first bounceback:
We’re sorry, but your email message to
[“replies+416dc1bda0f5970ebe442e1deee121f8@talk.lugbz.org”] (titled Re:
[LUGBZ Forum] [General] Testing Discours for LugBZ) didn’t work.
To promote more in depth conversations, very short replies are not
allowed. Can you please reply with at least 20 characters?
Alternatively, you can like a post via email by replying with “+1”.
So be more verbose…
esatto @andog unter 20 zeichen wird man nicht zur kenntnis genommen…
a mio avviso questa regola va bene 
( al telefono mi viene il nervoso se ricevo messaggi tipo “ti chiamo dopo” (meno di 20)
toni
No Anton, questo non serve a nulla in quanto questa lista sarebbe ignota e senza altri membri iscritti; l’unica cosa che avrebbe senso sarebbe- eventualente- di resuscitare la mailing-list originale del LugBZ lugbz-list@lugbz.org ovvero lugbz-list@lists.lugbz.org , rimasta attiva dalla fondazione sino a qualche mese fa, con tutti gli iscritti alla stessa.
Avevo capito, dalle spiegazioni ricevute, che scrivere su https://talks.lugbz.org con Category=Generale e un topic sarebbe stato equivalente. Da qui il mio test, prima di procedere ad un invio serio. Se così non è, rinuncio e basta.
ciao,
diego
…attenzione “talk.lugbz.org”
“equivalente” per modo di dire…
In ogni caso la vecchia mailinglist continua ad avere nuova vita in talk.lugbz.org
il prossimo passo importante sara’ la definizione delle categorie che purtroppo dobbiamo fare “ex-post” … (ci sta lavorando franz che prossimamente fara’ una proposta.
Altro discorso invece, @diego.maniacco, e’ la questione di come contattare tutti iscrittie e simpatizzanti… questo e’ un compito (anche urgente) che deve partire dal board, giusto ?
Vecchia mailing-list: se il problema è avere dati da chi la gestiva in precedenza, credo sia compito del Board/Presidente farlo. Giusto?
Inzwischen ist wahrscheinlich offenkundig, dass die öffentlichen Beiträge der alten mailinglist alle hier sind.
Mir scheint, jetzt und anderswo auf talk.lugbz waeren v.a. die Möglichkeiten der Moderation / des community-building in discourse zu erproben.
Also ein neuer Thread/Topic (oder eigene Kategorie) ?